What is The Difference Between Charity And Limbo, Programming Languages

Charity is an Interpreted Programming Language, while Limbo is a Concurrent Programming Language

What are Interpreted Programming Languages

An interpreted language is a programming language for which most of its implementations execute instructions directly, without previously compiling a program into machine-language instructions. The interpreter executes the program directly, translating each statement into a sequence of one or more subroutines already compiled into machine code. (Wikipedia)

What are Concurrent Programming Languages

Concurrent programming is a computer programming technique that provides for the execution of operations concurrently â€” either within a single computer, or across a number of systems. In the latter case, the term distributed computing is used. (Wikipedia)

While Charity is an Interpreted Programming Language, and Limbo is a Concurrent Programming Language

Let us now look at the difference between the two:

What is Charity Programming Language – A brief synopsis

It is a purely functional, not-Turing-complete language, which means that all its programs are guaranteed to terminate. Charity was designed at the University of Calgary, a public University in Canada.

What is Limbo Programming Language – A brief synopsis

Developed at the Bell Labs, Limbo is used for programming distributed systems. Its striking feature is its compiler’s ability to generate architecture-independent object code. Limbo is used for applications running on Inferno operating system. Alex that was initially a part of the Plan 9 operating system is the predecessor of Limbo.